Posts and comments made on this site are not the opinions of the owner Worst Property Agents | Leeds - student

Leedsstudenthomes.com

February 12, 2011 12:13 by Admin

There is a lot about leedsstudenthomes.com on the following links;

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2217305932&v=wall

http://www.lettingexpert.com/forums/Blah.pl?b-RLLLA/m-1223405590/

Students' landlord in clash over deposits

A STUDENT landlord is to face a tribunal after almost 50 complaints from tenants in Leeds that they had not received their deposits back.

Rory Aitkens of LeedsStudentHomes.com has been told to pay back any money he owes by student housing charity Unipol or risk facing expulsion from a landlords scheme in the city. 

Leeds University's Student Union is advising people who have still not received their money back within the next 21 days to pursue it through the small claims court. 

Mr Aitkens signed up last year to Unipol's voluntary code of standards for student landlords, which aims provide protection for students.

However he now faces a tribunal after being accused of breaching the charity's code by failing to return deposits to students within six weeks of the end of their tenancies. 

The complaints against Mr Aitkens will be heard at a tribunal next week. The panel could permanently ban him from the signing up to the Unipol code of standards in future. 

The Government has introduced a new mandatory protection scheme for deposits which mean landlords have to keep the cash in separate accounts and return it to the students within 10 days of the end of the tenancy.

However the new rules only came into force this April and do not apply to any contract signed before then.

Mr Aitkens insisted to the Yorkshire Post he had very little money left to pay back. 

"In the last 10 days I have more or less done everything that needs to be done," he said. 

He said the majority of delays in returning deposits were in joint tenancy agreements where a section of the rent was still outstanding. 

"If you have a joint tenancy where four people have paid their rent but another student hasn't then they will all be waiting until the rent is paid before I can return their deposits," he said. 

He added that delays in deposits could also be caused by students moving out of properties at different times, making it difficult to establish who was liable to pay for any damage or the clean-up costs needed on a student property. 

Mr Aitkens also said LeedsStudentHomes.com no longer existed and he was no longer working as a letting agent. 

He said: "I have had contact with Unipol and I have said to them that the code of standards I signed up to was from February to February so it no longer applies to me as I have not been signed up since February this year." 

The Unipol code of standards administrator, Simon Kemp, said: "It is very disappointing to get so many complaints against a member of the code of standards, especially ones that concern allegations relating to the return of deposits. 

"I would not expect such a tag to apply to landlords or agents signed up to the Unipol Code. It is therefore in everybody's interest if Mr Aitkens simply returns the deposit money owed to his former tenants." 

Leeds University's Student Union community officer Sara Gill said: "With student debt ever increasing this situation is simply unacceptable, and we sincerely hope that Mr Aitkens' promise of repaying the money owed materialises." 

Tenants 'left in the dark' by company 

CASE STUDY 

TENANTS claim they have been left in the dark about where their money has gone after renting student properties from landlord Rory Aitkens. 

David Highfield, 22, of Woodhouse, rented a property in Burley Road, Leeds, from LeedsStudentHomes.com during the last academic year but says he has still yet to receive his deposit back. 

When he visited the firm's base in Victoria Road, Leeds, to retrieve his deposit he found the firm had moved and a new company was now based there. 

He said: "They gave me a forwarding address for LeedsStudentHomes.com but this was just a PO Box . There was a mobile number, but no one would ever get back to you.

"A month ago I received a letter saying our deposit would be paid and then on September 21 Mr Aitkens said we would be paid within 10 days – but 10 days has passed and as far as I know nobody has received their deposit back yet. 

"All of my housemates' rent was paid up and our bills were paid as well."

Mr Highfield, who is in his final year of a business course at Leeds Metropolitan University, is now planning to attend the tribunal hearing next

Source: http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/around-yorkshire/local-stories/students_landlord_in_clash_over_deposits_1_2471680 


Providence Properties update - from the BBC website

February 2, 2011 12:58 by Admin

In November, Watchdog ran a report on Tariq Zaman, one-time director of Providence Properties, a student lettings agency in Leeds. Tariq left students thousands of pounds out of pocket when he refused to refund their deposits. And his staff shared the same extraordinary attitude. Following further complaints to Watchdog we went back to see if anything had changed.

Since November none of the people we met have had their money back. Understandably they're furious.

Students Kate Hattersley and Rick Lord took Tariq to court and won. But there's still no sign of their deposits.

Kate and Rick resorted to using bailiffs to try and get the money back the court says they're owed. But the bailiffs couldn't find anything registered in Tariq's name to seize.

Kate said "I want my money back. I just want my money back. I know it's been a long time but it's still a lot of money."

It seems incredible that even with the law behind them, these students still haven't had their money back. We've now heard from plenty more people who say they haven't had their deposit back either. We needed answers from Tariq who has now resigned from Providence Properties Ltd, and were determined to track him down. When we finally did catch up with him he wasn't too keen to talk.

Eventually Tariq did agree to speak but despite the judgements against him he refused to accept he should give the money back.

Tariq said: "A lot of students, they want nice houses, but they just totally abuse them. I made a mistake, every time I received a county court judgement, because the tenant has been wrong, and I have not challenged them. Every single case I am going to reopen them and challenge every single case."

We've seen evidence that properties weren't damaged at all. But warming to his theme Tariq decides to show us exactly how students treat his houses.

We decided at Watchdog to take him up on the offer but were surprised when he took us to one that even he had to admit was in perfect nick.


He's keen to show us more but we don't bother, and we're no closer to knowing why he's still holding on to tenants' money.

Following our meeting with Tariq Zaman in Leeds, he sent us the following statement:

"I am a landlord involved in the student lettings market which, at times, can be a contentious business to be in. Often, student houses are vacated in a less than satisfactory condition and works are often required to rectify damage or losses at the houses. This is why deposits are taken in the first place.

"You will note that after being interviewed, I offered Mr Campbell the opportunity to visit some student properties that I own and operate.

"I offered Mr Campbell this opportunity to show the wide spectrum of student accommodation and the varying conditions in which it can be left.

"I note that Mr Campbell and his camera crew declined the opportunity to do so. For the sake of balanced reporting I would request that this point is made very clear in your broadcast.

"You will undoubtedly appreciate that there are cases where deposit money has to be used to rectify damage or losses then this can often result in a contentious situation.

"I wish to point out that all of my deposits are now lodged in compliance with the statutory tenancy deposit scheme.

"I am aware that there have been several County Court judgments against me. I stand by my comments that having County Court judgments against you does not make you a criminal. CCJs are purely a civil matter.

"For the avoidance of doubt, I am not aware of any current or previous criminal investigations involving me.

"I also stand by my comments that having a County Court judgment against someone does not mean that you will get your money back. There are many situations in which having a County Court judgement against someone does not mean you will get your money back including (for example) a situation where you get a judgment against someone but they don't have the money to pay the judgment; that is, enforcement action is unsuccessful. Another situation is where a judgment is obtained and no enforcement action is taken.

"I would suggest that this is not a question of my opinion, it is a fact.

"Having carefully reviewed my own records, I have noted that the judgments against me were granted, in the main, because I failed to defend the court actions being brought against me and therefore judgments were awarded in default. I do not recall an occasion where I actually attended court to present my side of the story. I should, of course, have attended court and defended the County Court actions, but running my business did not allow me the time to do so.

"I do now intend to seek appropriate professional advice to look at those judgments made against me."

Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/watchdog/2008/12/providence_properties_update.html